In 2001, two physicists turned whale researchers, John Hildebrand and Mark McDonald, stumbled upon a perplexing anomaly while attempting to develop a system for automatically detecting blue whale songs off the coast of southern California. Despite their efforts, the algorithm kept crashing. Blue whale songs, which fall below the range of human hearing, required speeding up for us to perceive their ethereal patterns. However, Hildebrand and McDonald discovered that the tonal frequencies of these songs had been steadily sinking over three consecutive years.
This phenomenon, marked by a 30 percent decline in frequencies over 40 years, became a major enigma in blue whale research. Blue whales, the largest animals on Earth, known for their 180-decibel songs audible up to 500 miles away, had inexplicably shifted from bass to basso profundo, akin to the shift from Elvis to Barry White. This intriguing transformation, consistent globally despite different local anthems, baffled scientists.
In 2009, the researchers formally documented the falling song frequencies in an Endangered Species Research journal article, proposing various hypotheses such as climate change, whaling-related shifts, and rising ocean noise. However, none of these explanations proved satisfactory, as the observed linear progression in song frequency did not align with the rates of change in environmental factors.
Recent observations by Hildebrand and his colleagues at Scripps suggested a plateau in California's blue whale song frequencies. While Hildebrand supports the population recovery hypothesis, suggesting that as post-whaling populations recover, the decline in song frequency plateaus, others like Ally Rice remain skeptical. The complex theory hinges on the assumption that as populations rebound, whales can afford to sing at lower pitches due to shorter communication distances. However, this doesn't neatly align with observed population growth rates across different regions.
Despite the uncertainties, Hildebrand hopes researchers will investigate similar plateaus in blue whale songs globally to validate the population recovery hypothesis. If proven correct, song frequency could become a metric for estimating blue whale populations, offering a simpler alternative to current challenging methods. Yet, the mystery of what is causing blue whale songs to change remains elusive, and as Rice expresses, perhaps the whales are entitled to retain some of their mysteries in the vastness of the oceans.